Saturday, June 8, 2019

Federal Legalization of Recreational Marijuana Research Paper

Federal Legalization of Recreational Marijuana - Research Paper ExampleProponents argue that legalizing marijuana would increase revenue, lower burden on righteousness enforcement, increase national security, safeguards individual rights, and make consumption safer. Opponents on the other hand, argue legalizing marijuana would create a gateway for harder drugs like cocaine, emergence of opaque markets, create new users, cause health problems, and loss of productivity. The issue is thus a headache for the federal and state governments bearing in mind the in the public eye(predicate) support that legalization has been getting over the years. Leaders and mostly governors are also at a loss whether to succumb to peoples involve or use their discretion or moral determine in deciding whether to support or not. The issue is thus becoming a striking concern not only for law enforcement officers but also parents, educators, health care workers, government and the public as a whole. This paper is to discuss the give surrounding federal legalization of recreational marijuana to get an insight into its complexity.Whilst Hanson et al, Donovan et al, Rushefsky, and Fox et al argue that legalization is necessary for a safer society Martel is against such(prenominal) a move. Morgan on the other hand, gives a balanced view on the subject. Martel argues that it is the media especially print media who constructed the problem of recreational marijuana in the 1960s, reported on it and mobilized groups around the issue by creating a moral panic (Martel 11). Moral panic in this case refers to sudden rise of an issue, often out of balance wheel with reality, and it is more or less equally rapid disappearance from public agenda (13). This moral panic created fear in the public that their social values are being threatened by drug use giving rise to Pro-marijuana groups in its defense to the public and also law governing bodies. This Martel believes should be rejected at all cos t. He agrees with Blanchard the Attorney Generals sentiments that it is time to take into account

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.