Perspectives on Divorce

in that respect be legion(predicate) a(prenominal) split of the instinct that effect the way we live and act every mavin day. There is the frontal lobe which controls planning, organizing, coordinating and controls movements, reasoning and the overall thinking process. I harbour utilize my frontal lobe at present when I decided to compile this es severalise, and how I was going to set it up. There is the temporal lobe which controls hearing. I used this today when I listened to my Ipod in the halls.There is the cerebellum which controls balance, movement, and coordination. I used this today when I tried to dance during lunch (key word tried.. ). There is too the occipital lobe which controls vision. I used this today when I suppose a book during English. The possibly most important part of the outlook is the medulla, which controls vital functions. I used this today when I had to go from the initiative floor to the third floor, and I had to catch my breath.When people say your eye dont travel to, your nose doesnt smell, your tongue doesnt taste, your ears dont hear, and your skin doesnt touch your brain does it all they be saying although we associate all of those senses with their respective body part real we cant see, touch, taste and so on with reveal our brain first affect it and telling our bodies what is going on. 2) The psychoanalytical attitude says person may catch up with a divorce because their parents had gotten a divorce, so thats what the have seen is normal.This perspective says that many airs are ground on childhood experiences. If psyche grew up with split parents, they would see that that is an unexceptionable way to live their life and not see a problem with it. Also, the psychoanalytical perspective looks at the impulses and desires of a person, someone might postulate a divorce because their ID tells them they want to have duplex partners, and not want to be in a committed relationship. The behaviouristic perspe ctive is based on rewards and punishments.Based on this theory someone may get a divorce because they might be punished by tour of dutying in of the relationship. Their parents may not be a buff of their spouse, and may threaten to cut them off communications and write them out of the will if they stay in the relationship. The person may find this a deal they cant turn down, so they would divorce their partner in order to stay in the good graces of their family. The biological perspective looks at the brain as the reason people brand name decisions.They would say that there is a chemical imbalance in the brain, therefore the person cannot stay happily in their marriage. They could also say that the person has depression, due to an imbalance of serotonin, and could not be happy with their spouse, so they would need to get treated, or continue perusing the divorce. The cognitive perspective believes that divorce would be based on the individuals unique thinking process. The per son may have indecipherable thoughts on their spouse, and cannot figure out what they want in their marriage.The cognitive perspective would not blame any external forces, they would simply say their brain told them to, so they did. They might also say their brain does not make good judgment, and at the time of the marriage there was a reach in judgment. The humanistic perspective would say the person needed individualized growth, and was tied down in the marriage. The person would see themselves happier without being with their spouse. They would say that the person simply wanted to get a divorce, so they did, and wouldnt chip in much more to it than that.The sociocultural perspective would say that the divorce deem in America is 51%, so the person sees it culturally acceptable to get a divorce. They would say they have seen so many of their peers acquiring divorced, it seems normal. So they might not work to work out their problems, they sound get a divorce because thats wha t over half of America is doing. eclecticism is an approach that uses more than one theory to explain how or why something happens. This idea would be beneficial to describing human behavior because there are many contributing factors in peoples decision making.They might do something for duple reasons, using divorce as an example, a person might have grown up in a divorced home, but they also might have a cheating spouse, and a chemical imbalance in the brain. Their reason for divorce cant simply be explained by the psychoanalytic, behavioristic, or biological perspective. But when you use all of the perspectives together you can get a clear understanding of why they got a divorce. Human behavior cannot be explained with only one perspective because there are many contributing factors to the decisions people make.